|
Post by pmathi on Mar 27, 2012 17:57:00 GMT -5
IMO, 2 times a week is good enough, 3 times a week is too much its almost one game every 48 hours and that is kind of hard when you have human opponents. But 2 times a week would be perfect (advancing every Sunday and thursdays(Nights) for example)
|
|
|
Post by Rush on Mar 27, 2012 20:56:49 GMT -5
Glad someone started this thread. Would like to hear what everyone else has to say.
3 advances a week can be alot for some people, but think about it this way, if we did 3 it might allow us to play 3 seasons opposed to 2.
|
|
|
Post by jeffjk123 on Mar 27, 2012 22:23:31 GMT -5
Twice per week.
|
|
|
Post by pepperny on Mar 27, 2012 23:15:32 GMT -5
i agree with twice per week
|
|
|
Post by jvalencia82 on Mar 27, 2012 23:17:45 GMT -5
twice a week is fine.
|
|
|
Post by xbambiraptor on Mar 28, 2012 7:04:59 GMT -5
I think it should vary upon week. Some people might be doing something certain weeks where another they may have mode free time.
|
|
|
Post by Keller on Mar 28, 2012 7:49:11 GMT -5
Just my take - a faster advance schedule keeps people interested, assuming people actually keep up with the schedule. Obviously if they don't, it creates a problem but moving things along quickly and not having a lot of downtime between games is big for keeping people engaged.
If I had it my way, we'd advance every 48hrs.
|
|
|
Post by pepperny on Mar 28, 2012 11:16:43 GMT -5
Just my take - a faster advance schedule keeps people interested, assuming people actually keep up with the schedule. Obviously if they don't, it creates a problem but moving things along quickly and not having a lot of downtime between games is big for keeping people engaged. If I had it my way, we'd advance every 48hrs. people also have other committments other then playing in this league and even at peak time most leagues run 2 games a week advance rate
|
|
|
Post by Keller on Mar 28, 2012 12:23:51 GMT -5
Just my take - a faster advance schedule keeps people interested, assuming people actually keep up with the schedule. Obviously if they don't, it creates a problem but moving things along quickly and not having a lot of downtime between games is big for keeping people engaged. If I had it my way, we'd advance every 48hrs. people also have other committments other then playing in this league and even at peak time most leagues run 2 games a week advance rate I understand - a lot of us do. Thats why we're having the discussion now
|
|
|
Post by Rush on Mar 28, 2012 12:45:02 GMT -5
It's looking like twice a week.
We can always bump it down the road if owners think they can handle it. See how season 1 goes.
|
|
|
Post by jvalencia82 on Mar 28, 2012 12:56:53 GMT -5
Just my take - a faster advance schedule keeps people interested, assuming people actually keep up with the schedule. Obviously if they don't, it creates a problem but moving things along quickly and not having a lot of downtime between games is big for keeping people engaged. If I had it my way, we'd advance every 48hrs. people also have other committments other then playing in this league and even at peak time most leagues run 2 games a week advance rate I meant to comment oh Keller but forgot.. I find that twice a week is more then enough, I just feel that we will run into alot of scheduling issues with an advance rate of 48hours.
|
|
|
Post by jeffjk123 on Mar 28, 2012 13:55:56 GMT -5
Also...if all games are played, then advance. I think it should be a rough schedule of twice per week and if all games are done before then then just advance it. But stick to two days as a guidline like Tues Thurs or Weds. Sat. If all games are done before Weds night, advance, etc.
Makes the most sense to have it at 2 times a week and advance as games are all played.
|
|
|
Post by Keller on Mar 29, 2012 18:38:20 GMT -5
Its two times a week unless we finish sooner.
We can reevaluate later but thats what we're going with for now.
|
|